events:free_licenses
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
events:free_licenses [2016/01/04 14:07] – [Finally: BSD-Style Unix Source Licenses] wkt | events:free_licenses [2016/01/04 14:29] – [Drafting the License Terms] wkt | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
The minutiae of the dialogue on the license terms (before the first draft) between myself and SCO can be found in these e-mails: | The minutiae of the dialogue on the license terms (before the first draft) between myself and SCO can be found in these e-mails: | ||
- | * Unordered List Item [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
The history from this point turns somewhat sour, as Caldera became the SCO Group (TSG, aka "New SCO") and began [[https:// | The history from this point turns somewhat sour, as Caldera became the SCO Group (TSG, aka "New SCO") and began [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Near the end of this saga, Judge Kimball, who presided over the SCO v. Novell case, ruled that Novell, not the SCO Group, is the rightful owner of the copyrights covering the Unix operating system. (//ibid.//) | ||
+ | |||
+ | As Novell did not issue any of the above licenses, it may mean that they are technically invalid: old SCO, Caldera and new SCO only had the right to sub-license the Unix source code. This leaves the legal status of these licenses in a very grey area. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, given that the Unix Archive has now been available anonymously for well over a decade, it would be absolutely impossible to put the early Unix source code back into the genie' | ||
// | // | ||
events/free_licenses.txt · Last modified: 2023/02/16 08:00 by admin