events:free_licenses
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
events:free_licenses [2016/01/04 14:01] – [And Then, Free Source Licenses] wkt | events:free_licenses [2016/01/04 14:11] – [Postscript: Uncertainty] wkt | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
===== Finally: BSD-Style Unix Source Licenses ===== | ===== Finally: BSD-Style Unix Source Licenses ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Once the Unix business had been sold to Caldera, there were more internal changes, and in January 2002 I received this [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | > I'm happy to let you know that Caldera International has placed the ancient UNIX releases (V1-7 and 32V) under a " | ||
+ | > | ||
+ | > Many thanks to Warren Toomey, of PUPS, and to Caldera' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Wow! We had gone from no licenses to binary-only licenses, to paid then free licenses, and now BSD-style licenses. I could finally make the [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Postscript: Uncertainty ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The history from this point turns somewhat sour, as Caldera became the SCO Group (TSG, aka "New SCO") and began [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Near the end of this saga, Judge Kimball, who presided over the SCO v. Novell case, ruled that Novell, not the SCO Group, is the rightful owner of the copyrights covering the Unix operating system. (//ibid.//) | ||
+ | |||
+ | As Novell did not issue any of the above licenses, it may mean that they are technically invalid: old SCO, Caldera and new SCO only had the right to sub-license the Unix source code. This leaves the legal status of these licenses in a very grey area. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, given that the Unix Archive has now been available anonymously for well over a decade, it would be absolutely impossible to put the early Unix source code back into the genie' | ||
+ | |||
// | // | ||
events/free_licenses.txt · Last modified: 2023/02/16 08:00 by admin